« The truth about response rates | Main | Affiliate programs vs joint ventures »

September 30, 2005

Seminars versus "sellinars"

The results of a recent survey by a software trade association showed that while spending was up for seminars, satisfaction was down.

The biggest complaint? People are tired of paying high enrollment fees and taking time off work for presentations that are nothing more than a thinly veiled sales pitch.

There are two primary models for seminars. The “seminar model” is to provide fantastic information with either no sales pitches allowed, or only a short mention of your products or services. The “sellinar model” (my term) is to have a lot of speakers give very little hard information, then segue into a compelling sales pitch.

Many seminar companies and speakers favor the “sellinar model”. Because the speakers are contractually obligated to split the profits with the seminar company, both make a lot more money than they would without the platform sales. Others feel that it’s a conflict of interest to charge a lot of money only to have the audience bludgeoned with non-stop sales pitches.

Personally, I think there has to be a balance between the two. Look, no speaker can possibly cover all aspects of a valuable topic in an hour or so. So it’s in the audience members’ best interest to be able to purchase further information on something they’re truly interested in. But you can also pack a lot of useful information into an hour, and I believe that each speaker is obligated to do so.

What do you think?

Posted by Bob Serling at September 30, 2005 08:38 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.directmarketinginsider.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/3

Comments

Bob,

I have attended both.

I agree that a speaker cannot do justice to most subjects in an hour and he/she is a business person and needs to sell to justify their expenses.

The attendees should be aware of this and should be able to tell whether or not the speaker has anything that they need. If not, they shouldn't buy without some more investigation.

I have only purchased, while attending an event one time. I bought 2 small ticket items from an event and both were disappointing. My fault, not theirs.

On the otherhand, I paid an extra $100 to hear Ted Nicholas speak, and it was well spent. It was an unannounced bonus that sent the money to charity. We even wrote the check to the charity in question and Mr. Nicholas donated his time.

There are rules of common and good sense that must be followed in regard to purchases at seminars, just like everywhere, but we have to allow speakers to try to cover their expenses. It's only fair.

The only recourse we have is to boycott speakers and events that don't provide a level of free content that justifys the selling at the end.

Posted by: Mike Sigers [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 9, 2005 08:40 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?